Sunday, September 30, 2012

Exam 1 Review


                                                    Medieval Exam Review

Beowulf
·      Summary
o   Beowulf tells the story of a young hero he seeks to prove himself by fighting a murderous monster named Grendel who had been terrorizing a neighboring kingdom. After successful defeating Grendel and his mother, Beowulf returns home and eventually becomes the leader of his country. As he slips into old age a new threat, in the form of a dragon, rises and Beowulf must defend his kingdom. He eventually defeats the dragon, but he loses his life in the process.
·      Characters
o   Beowulf
o   Grendel
o   Hrothgar
o   Wiglaf
o   Dragon
o   Grendel’s Momma
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Lanval
·      Summary
o   Lanval’s a story about an Arthurian knight who’s not particularly well liked by his peers or his king–jealousy being the reason. One day he gets called into the woods at the behest of a fairy who claims to be in love with him. She showers him with love, gifts, and her body and tells Lanval that she will be his so long as he doesn’t reveal their love to anyone. This presents a problem when king Arthur’s wife makes a pass at Lanval, and challenges his manhood when rejected. As a result, Lanval reveals to Guinevere that he has the love of the most beautiful woman in the world. Scorned, Guinevere accuses Lanval of making romantic advancer toward her and king Arthur puts him on trial for his offenses. Lanval is demanded to present in order to show the truth in his statement, yet she has turned her back on him for revealing their romance to Guinevere. The story concludes with the fairy coming to the trial at the last minute to prove Lanval was truthful when describing her beauty, and whisking him away to live happily ever after with her.
·      Characters
o   Lanval
o   Fairy
o   Guinevere
o   King Arthur
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
·      Summary
o   Gawain accepts a challenge from a green knight. The challenge: Gawain gets to chop the green knight’s head off and in exchange the knight gets to do the same one year later. Assuming that the green knight wouldn’t be alive to deliver his blow, Gawain chops the knight’s head off. Shockingly, the knight picks up his head, and leaves after telling Gawain that he must seek out the green knight in one year’s time to fulfill his oath. The year passes and Gawain eventually must leave the castle to seek out the green knight, though he until the last moment to begin his journey. After searching for weeks to no avail, Gawain comes across the castle of Lord Bertilak and his court. Bertilak welcomes Gawain into his castle and treats him like a king. When Lord Bertilak leaves to go on a hunting trip he makes a pact with Gawain that he shall receive whatever the Lord catches on the hunt, but in exchange Gawain must give Bertilak anything he receives while he’s away.  While Gawain is relaxing at the castle, Lady Bertilak begins a number of attempts to seduce him. Gawain receives kisses from Lady Bertilak on two occasions, which he then gave to Lord Bertilak when he returned from his hunting trip, fulfilling their bargain. On the third occasion, in addition to kisses, Lady Bertilak gives Gawain a green garter. Gawain keeps the garter for himself–breaking the oath–and eventually leaves to find the green knight. When he finds the knight, its revealed that it was Lord Bertilak all along, and the plot was setup to test Gawain’s virtue. For keeping the garter Bertilak gives Gawain a cut on his neck, but otherwise forgives him for the oath breaking. Gawain adopts the garter as a reminder of his sin (oath breaking) and upon returning to Arthur’s castle, the knights of the round adopt the garter as a symbol of virtue.
·      Characters
o   Gawain
o   King Arthur
o   The Green Knight/Lord Bertilak
o   Lady Bertilak
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Miller’s Tale/Prologue
·      Summary
o   A drunken miller tells a story in a tavern to group of pilgrims on their way to visit Canterbury Cathedral. 
o   The story: An old carpenter marries a young woman and out of jealousy keeps her under watch for fear that she might have an affair. In addition, the carpenter rents out a room of their house to a young, suave, university student. Predictable, the student and the young wife begin develop a relationship, and a desire to spend the night together, the student comes up with a plan to trick the carpenter into spending the night outside of the house so he and the young wife can spend the night together in his bed. The student tells the carpenter that he received a message from God indicating there will be a flood bigger than Noah’s, and that the three of them must sleep in wooden buckets in the barn so that when the flood comes they will float safely. The night of the supposed flood, the three of them lay in their individual buckets, and as soon as the carpenter falls asleep the student and the young wife escape to the carpenter’s bed to fulfill their passion. The next morning a clerk who’s romantically interested in the young wife comes by the house to woo her. After some convincing the young wife agrees to give the clerk a kiss, but when the clerk leaned in to for it the wife presents her butt instead. To get back at the wife, the clerk grabs a red hot poker with the intention of burning the wife’s butt. He asks for another kiss but instead the student sticks his butt out and the clerk burns it with the poker. The student jumps up screaming for water, which wakes the carpenter up who takes the scream as a sign the flood has come. He cuts rope that bound his bucket to the rafters of the barn, which caused him to fall to the floor.
·      Characters
o   Jon the carpenter
o   Alison
o   Absilon
o   Nicholas
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Wife of Bath’s Prologue/Tale
·      Summary
o   A woman who had been married five times goes into length about the merits of giving domestic control to women.
o   The story: An Arthurian knight is accused and convicted of rape, but before being sentenced to death king Arthurs wife intercedes on the knight’s behalf. In order to spare his life, the Guinevere charges the knight with finding out what women truly want. After searching for a year, and getting completely different answers depending on which woman he’s speaking to, he comes across an old ugly hag who promises to give him the answer at the cost a favor to be paid after.  The knight takes the hag back to court and tells Guinevere that what women want most is total control over men. Guinevere agreed and his life was spared. The hag then request marriage as payment. The knight begrudgingly agrees and the two get married. After complaints from the knight, the hag gives him a choice: either take the woman as she is, old and ugly, yet faithful, or she can become young and beautiful but likely to have an affair. After a deep contemplation the knight finally tells the hag to choose the option that she thinks is best for the couple. Since he gave his wife control in making the decision, the hag becomes youthful and beautiful, but unquestionably faithful; the ideal situation.
·      Characters
o   Knight
o   Old Hag
o   Rape Victim
o   King Arthur
o   Guinevere
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Pardoner’s Prologue/Tale
·      Summary
o   A sketchy man who sells absolution be means of fake relics tells a story.
o   The story: Three boys seek Death to get vengeance for taking one of their friends. After searching they find an old man who tells them Death is hanging out by a large tree. When the get to the tree the find a large sack of gold. Knowing they’d be branded as thieves if they took the large sack of gold into town, the two boys sent the third into town to get vessels to hide the gold in. realizing they would be richer if the third boy was out of the picture, the two plot to murder him when he gets back from town. However, the third boy realizes the same and plots to kill the other two and take all the gold for himself. So, while in town he purchases some poison and spikes a bottle of wine with it. Upon returning to the tree the two boys ambush and murder him. To celebrate the newfound wealth they both take a drink from the poisoned wine and die.
·      Characters
o   Death
o   Two boy
o   Younger boy
o   Old Man
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Margery Kemp
·      Summary
o   After nearly dying during childbirth a woman seeks absolution from a priest by confessing her sins. Instead of forgiveness the priest berates the woman for her sins, which eventually leads to the woman to have a mental breakdown. She begins to act crazy, going so far as self-inflicting wounds. The woman then has a vision that Christ came down from heaven to talk to her, asking only why she’s intent on forsaking him when he’s never forsook her. From then on the woman rededicates herself to Christ. She negotiates a deal of celibacy with her husband, and eventually goes off on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. While there, the woman engages in extremely emotional outburst when visiting places Christ was said to have been. Her load, public cries annoyed many patrons. She eventually has a vision that God wants her to marry his son, Jesus. Thus, she enters into a mental marriage that was at times erotic.
·      Characters
o   Margery Kemp
·      Analysis
·      Quotes
Everyman
·       Summary
o   Everyman is called by Death to go to heaven and account for his sins in front of God. Not wanting to go alone, Everyman asks Death if he can take a companion. Death agrees if Everyman can find someone willing to make the journey with him. First, Everyman asks Fellowship to go with him to death; Fellowship declines. Everyman then petitions Kinship and Cousin to go with, yet both decline. Everyman then turns to Goods to make the trip, but Goods declines. Lastly, Everyman asks Good Deeds to journey with him. Good Deeds is willing to go, except because Everyman didn’t spend enough time doing Good Deeds in his life, Good Deeds reluctantly declines. Instead Good Deeds refers Everyman to Knowledge to help solve the problem. Knowledge instructs Everyman to confess his sins, which is the only good deed needed to allow Good Deeds to venture to heaven with him. After confession, Good Deeds goes with Everyman to Death.
·      Characters
o   Everyman
o   Good Deeds
o   Cousin
o   Kinship
o   Fellowship
o   Death
o   Knowledge
o   Goods
·      Analysis
·      Quotes

Monday, September 17, 2012

Hey guys,

I found this helpful when going through the Chaucer readings. Check it out!

http://www.librarius.com/gy.htm

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Gawain and Women


          
Gawain and Women

          In "Amended Text, Emended Ladies: Female Agency and the Textual Editing of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight," author Paul Battles makes the argument that, since the original manuscript, editors have skewed the role women play in the poem. He displays his argument by citing editorial inconsistencies relating to role of Lady Bertilak, the status of Morgan le Fay, and the overall absence of women in the poem. While there were some difficulties in reconciling the differences between the original manuscript, Battles’ own edited versions, and my version of the story, I found his argument to be at times compelling and at times obsolete.
            Battles begins his argument by claiming that the role Lady Bertilak plays in some version of the poem is undermined by the editor. The author states, “There is a persistent strain in Gawain scholarship that minimizes the Lady’s role in testing the hero” (Battles 330). He furthers his point by saying, “She is often characterized as either meekly carrying out her husband’s commands or blindly obeying her lust…” (330). Battles disagrees with the marginalization of Lady Bertilak by arguing that she plays a central, and informed, role in the attempted seduction of Gawain. He asserts that Lady Bertilak has to know the scheme because she hints at it here and there during her and Gawain’s conversations. Further, the reader’s are explicitly told she knew of the overall plot when Lord Bertilak revealed the scheme at the end of the story.
            I tend to agree with Battles’ point. Lady Bertilak was a clear player in the scheme of testing Gawain’s virtue. She had to know Gawain was on his way to face her husband’s axe. Why else would she coyly hint, and tell Gawain that the green garter she’s trying to give him will make him, “safe against anyone who seeks to strike him” (1853)?
            The author goes further by claiming that in edited versions of the poem the role of Morgan le Fay is greatly downplayed as well. When speaking of critics Battles says, “Most have found it difficult to accept that Gawain’s real opponent all along has not been the mysterious Green Knight–or his alter ego, Sir Bertilak–but an ugly old crone whom the hero casually dismisses almost as soon as he sees her” (Battles 331). He cites different versions’ uses of punctuation, specifically between lines 2444-46, to support his claim that Morgan is marginalized. As it stands the line reads, “I am called Bertilak de Hautdesert in this land. Through the power of Morgan la Fay, who lives in my house, and [her] skill in learning …” (Battles 333). Battles claims that the period after the first line creates an unnecessary division in Bertilak’s statement, which leads him to ramble on about Morgan le Fay. By contrast, removing the period and allowing the lines to come together as one sentence Morgan is given more power, for Bertilak wouldn’t be seen as explaining Morgan’s prominence and skills as a side note.
            Again, I agree with Battles; Morgan le Fay was the main perpetrator of the scheme. I find it odd that as the mastermind of the plot to test Gawain she is rarely mentioned; and when she is it’s almost like Bertilak is saying, “By the way, this is Morgan; this is what she does; but I’m the important person in all of this!” Even though Bertilak went to challenge the Knights of the Round at the request of Morgan, his statement that Morgan lives “in his house” makes it seem like she’s a subordinate, or servant of his; which greatly marginalizes the woman, whom for all intents and purposes, caused this whole story to take place.
            Lastly, Battles cites an emended version of the poem and its blatant removal of women from its context. Towards then end when Gawain returns to Arthur with the garter, now worn as a sash, the King proclaims that, “all Lords and Knights” who belong to the brotherhood wear the sash. However, Battles claims that in the manuscript the line states that, “all Lords and Ladies” wear the sash. On the replacement, Battles writes, “Nevertheless, emending ladis to ledes is a clear example of unwarranted editorial intervention that diminishes the importance of women” (Battles 337).
            I found this facet of Battles argument to be obsolete, for the version of text we read for class doesn’t include this replacement. In fact, our text reads, “as they laugh in lovely accord, / that the lords and ladies who belong to the Table, / every knight in the brotherhood, should bear such a belt” (2514-16). If the replacement Battles is referring isn’t found in a common college textbook, then perhaps the version he’s citing is out of date, which causes this facet of his argument to be uncompelling.
            Overall, I think Paul Battles makes a pretty good case for the marginalization of women caused by over zealous editing. Between Lady Bertilak’s seduction attempts and Morgan le Fay’s initial plot, it seems as though the women in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight played a larger role in the testing of Gawain than did the (supposed) main antagonist, and yet they’re seen as either giddy and lustful, or old and unimportant.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Beowulf Mini Essay


Kenning

            In the course of my life I have read a number of big story books, The Lord of the Rings being probably the most known, and in reading Beowulf I noticed a number of distinct similarities and differences. For example, both are big stories and both are epic in scale and scope. However, the major difference between the two is that while The Lord of the Rings is an epic series written as novels, Beowulf is an epic poem written in the tradition of Old English. There are a number of attributes associated with the Old English literary tradition, however the one that stood out to me the most was the use of kennings. Kenning, or that practice of using two words in place of one, is found throughout the epic. It had the effect of being thought provoking, at times distracting, and it presented an overall positive reading experience.
            Kennings in Beowulf were thought provoking in that when coming across an example in the poem I felt forced to ponder its hidden meaning. For example, the first instance use of kennings I encountered in the story comes in the prologue’s description of Shield Sheafson. He was described as being a, “terror of hall-troops” (5). The use of “hall-troops” in describing guards or soldiers forced me want to solve this “poetic riddle” (Simpson 9). Coming across Beowulf’s kennings was entertaining in that they presented a kind of game, but they were also at times a bit distracting.
            Kennings forced me to think a bit more about what the author was trying to convey, but in doing so some of the less intuitive combinations compelled me to stop for a moment to try and decipher its meaning. An example of a distracting kenning came when Beowulf landed on the Dane’s shores. The narrator described him as, “This is no mere / hanger-on in a hero’s armor” (250-251). I was forced to stop and reread the passage a number of times to try and get a clearer view of the meaning of the kenning used. In this case I had to eventually turn to my trusty dictionary for a formal definition of what a hanger-on was. While there were a few tougher kennings in the story, the use of them presented a better reading experience.
            The the combination of both thought provoking and distracting kennings gave the epic a bit of balance, and an overall positive feel when reading. To expand on this, it is hard to imagine what Beowulf would be like without the addition of kennings. For example, God is used many times throughout the poem, and he is expressed in a number of different combinations: “Lord of Life”, “Glorious Almighty”, “Almighty Father” etc. If they were removed, there would a constant, and perhaps, mundane repetition of just the word “God” that would have been a bit fatiguing going through the epic.
            Beowulf was a challenging read; it is long, it is removed from contemporary literary traditions, and with the addition of kennings, it is at times cryptic. However, the use of kennings made the story more interesting because they alleviated repetition, and they added a sense of entertaining challenge when trying to decipher some of the combinations. While some of the less intuitive kennings were a bit distracting, the story simply would not have been the same without them.